Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

Dear all,
I would like to thank all authors for providing the effort to do implementations and draft the document.
I think it is a useful document which should be progressed.

During review I think I found some nits including a missing reference and undefined entity (S’ was defined in v06 but is missing in the latest one) and suggest to add perhaps more details e.g., on some acronyms …
Please see attached diff sheet for your convenience.
Thanks!

Best Regards
Dirk

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:35 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Working Group:

As we discussed in the last IETF meeting, we are issuing WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.
The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. I am very pleased with the quality of this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group.

The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback.

Document Link:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11.txt


Please post any comments/concerns on this document.


Thanks!
Sri



_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm