Re: Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

Sridhar Bhaskaran <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CA+3a8ObT1WV3Z+PSoPTEM2SAqNQZbdZCBJ42Zr_7gyv_JcxcQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Pablo / Dave all,

See my additional comment inline marked [SB]

Regards
Sridhar

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:06 AM Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> Many thanks for your comments. Inline with PC.
>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm <[email protected]> On Behalf Of David Allan I
> Sent: viernes, 23 de julio de 2021 19:51
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on
> draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13
>
> Hi:
>
> Looking over this draft it strikes me that IF you are discussing a GTP
> replacement, there are a few unaddressed gaps...or at least I see no
> mention of them.
>
> -  adding X2 to the list of interfaces to be supported
> [PC] Do you think there is any new mechanism to be added to the currently
> defined ones?
>
> [SB] If we are including X2 then F1U also needs to be considered. Both X2
and F1U also have GTPU flow control mechanism defined in TS 38.425. I am
not sure if a corresponding feedback mechanism exists in SRv6 for flow
control.

-  support for end-marker for handoff stream synchronization (probably
> could fit the unused bit in Args.Mob.Session but frankly I have not studied
> this in detail)
> [PC] User Plane Message encoding is out of the scope of this draft.
> However, draft-murakami-dmm-user-plane-message-encoding-03 proposes a
> mechanism to encode the Echo Request, Echo Reply, Error Indication, and End
> Marker.
>
> -  support for QMP (quality measurement protocol), which I believe needs
> to also extend across the radio interface so is not simply local to the GTP
> domain and can be "stunt doubled"
> [PC] Excellent point. Seems we missed this one in draft-murakami! We can
> add in there the QoS Monitoring Packet indicator, as well as the encoding
> for the timestamps and average DL/UL delays.
>
> -  support for paging policy presence/indication
> [PC] Same as previous. Many thanks.
>
> [PC], By the way, I've posted an updated revision as the reference to
> draft-murakami was missing.
>
> If this has come up elsewhere, let me know
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>


-- 
 o__
 _>  /__
(_) \(_)... Burn fat not fuel - Bike along to a healthier life and cleaner
world! :)

Sridhar Bhaskaran

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.