Alvaro Retana's Abstain on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I appreciate the work that has gone into this document.  And the discussions
about the impact (or lack thereof) on the 3GPP architecture.

However, I believe this document shouldn't be published in the IETF stream,
regardless of its status.  I mainly considered the proposed applicability (for
example, "GTP-U protocol [TS.29281] is replaced by SRv6") and the fact that it
"is not related to any current technical work" in 3GPP [1].

I am then ABSTAINing and not standing in the way of publication.

[1]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/3gpp-ietf-coord/XV5GRtdJLLyqpuJr1unw03sf1-A/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.