Re: [Errata Verified] RFC6275 (5695)

Hi,

I noticed today that the updates/updated metadata for RFC6275 and RFC4302 (in the RFC index etc.) have not been updated according to this verified errata report.

Regards
    Brian Carpenter

On 12-Jan-24 23:52, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC6275,
> "Mobility Support in IPv6".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5695
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Verified
> Type: Editorial
> 
> Reported by: Brian Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Date Reported: 2019-04-16
> Verified by: Eric Vyncke (IESG)
> 
> Section: GLOBAL
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> [none]
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Updates: 4302 [in RFC header]
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Section 11.3.2 says:
>        The treatment of destination options described in RFC 4302 is
>        extended as follows.  The AH authentication data MUST be
>        calculated... [etc.]
> This is a change to the AH algorithm and should be flagged as a formal update to RFC 4302.
> 
> -- Verifier note (EV) ----
> 
> Indeed, RFC 6275 should formally update RFC 4302. This erratum sits somewhere between editorial and technical, and as it does not change the technical content itself, I edited the type to 'editorial'.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6275 (draft-ietf-mext-rfc3775bis-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Mobility Support in IPv6
> Publication Date    : July 2011
> Author(s)           : C. Perkins, Ed., D. Johnson, J. Arkko
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG