[DMM] Re: review comments to draft-mhkk-dmm-mup-architecture -02
Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:46:33 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Linda, thank you for your review. It is highly appreciated. > This node could implement SRv6 endpoint behaviors for GTP decapsulation (e.g., End.M.GTP6.E for IPv6 transport), allowing seamless integration with existing RAN deployments. Just a clarification, "End.M.GTP6.E" is actually a GTP-U encap behavior. But yes seamless integration with existing deployment need to be explained. Let me think. Cheers, --satoru > 2025/03/27 19:39、Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>のメール: > > DMM participants, > > As promised during the DMM session at IETF 122, I have reviewed draft-mhkk-dmm-mup-architecture-02. I found the document is very clearly written and easy to follow. > > Given the widespread deployment of 3GPP 4G/5G architectures, I think it would be valuable to include a section on interworking strategies that enable MUP to overlay existing infrastructure. This would allow the MUP routing-based user plane to be introduced incrementally, without disrupting current network operations. > > For instance, a MUP-PE could be deployed at the RAN backhaul edge—adjacent to a gNodeB or eNodeB—to terminate incoming GTP-U tunnels from the RAN. This node could implement SRv6 endpoint behaviors for GTP decapsulation (e.g., End.M.GTP6.E for IPv6 transport), allowing seamless integration with existing RAN deployments. > > Best regards, > > Linda Dunbar > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]