Re: [MEXT] Call for WG adoption of I-D: draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-altsec

 I support this draft moving forward and becoming a WG document. IMO
the current IPSec based security for MIP6 does have its drawbacks and
this draft offers an interesting alternative. I was able to play
around a bit with a MIP6 client implementing this draft, and it worked
flawlessly and to set it up was a breeze.

Domagoj


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of marcelo bagnulo braun
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 8:34 PM
> To: mext
> Subject: [MEXT] Call for WG adoption of I-D:
> draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-altsec
>
> The ID has had 3 reviews as we require.
> So, we are now  ready to ask the WG if they think we should adopt the
> document.
>
> Please express your opinion before monday 31st jan.
>
> Reviews can be found:
>
> The I-D: draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-altsec-06  has been reviewed by:
>
> 1. Jan Zorz
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04489.html
>
> 2. Domagoz Premec
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04457.html
>
> 3. Ryuji Wakikawa
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04470.html
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>