Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
"Charles E. Perkins" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wichorus Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello folks, I'd also like to be involved with the effort. I have two questions: - Does route optimization have a role to play? It certainly can serve the purpose of distributing traffic optimally... - What about a sort of "hierarchical PMIP"? Regards, Charlie P. On 3/2/2011 7:17 PM, liu dapeng wrote: > Hi Behcet, > > > 2011/2/19, Behcet Sarikaya<[email protected]>: >> Hi Dapeng, >> >> >> >>> >>> Hello Julien, >>> >>> Thanks for the information. But my question is: since the charter is >>> extended to "work on operational considerations on setting up Mobile >>> IPv6 networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way". Does >>> it mean that the extended charter include problem/gap/scenario >>> analysis of distributing the mobility anchor (DMM)? >>> >>> I remember it seem that people agreed to do the analysis work of DMM >>> as the first step in Beijing meeting? >> >> My understanding is that the new informational document will be inline with >> Julien's presentation he had in Beijing mext additional session we had on >> dmm >> and explain how MIPv6 as defined currently can be used to distribute the >> traffic >> in an optimal way. >> >> I suggest that you take the lead in this effort. > > ==> > > I think DMM barbof contributors have already done some work in this > area. So if people agree I would like to organize writing this draft. > Anyone who is interested > to join the design team could reply this mail to let me know. thanks. > > Best regards, > Dapeng Liu > >> Regards, >> >> Behcet >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > MEXT mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >