Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-17 comments

Tomasz Mrugalski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2011-03-18 21:48, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Tomek,
>   Can you please confirm that 
> 
> RSOO defined in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options-04 is for
> DHCPv6 only. 
Yes. I confirm.

> There's no need or intent to define similar option
> for DHCPv4.
I can't speak for the whole DHC WG. I haven't heard about such plans.
Also, keep in mind that DHCPv4 uses completely different approach to
relaying as compared to DHCPv6, so the usefulness of defining RSOO for
DHCPv4 is somewhat questionable.

Tomek
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.