Re: [MEXT] FW: Agenda requests for Prague meeting
marcelo bagnulo braun <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Please point exactly what item in the agenda is NOT about the Mobile IP protocol. El 20/03/11 15:13, Alexandru Petrescu escribió: > Marcelo, Hi, > > I have a doubt about the reasoning behind declining Fred's request of > agenda item. > > The current agenda > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/agenda/mext.txt > > contains items IMHO only remotely or very vaguely related to the Mobile > IPv6 protocol per se. Additionally, agenda's DMM core item has a > discussion which does not seem to converge on the use of Mobile IPv6. > > In this sense, I am not sure the typical statements of MEXT doing _only_ > Mobile IPv6 stuff holds any longer, as I see it today. > > Fred's "IRON and MOBIKE" draft-templin-ironmike-00.txt is related to IKE > which is related to Mobile IPv6 security. > > I am not trying to advertise Fred's draft particularly. I am saying > this because... > > I have the same agenda problem with similar work I do (RA-based routing) > for mobility, i.e. boxes which may run Mobile IPv6 but need something > else than Mobile IPv6 Type Codes. > > That is my doubt about MEXT activity and agenda planning, thanks. > > Alex > > Le 14/03/2011 19:56, marcelo bagnulo braun a écrit : >> Hi Fred, >> >> This is outside the scope of the MEXT wg, which is limited to the the >> Mobile IPv6 protocol. Hence, we decline your request. >> >> Regards, marcelo >> >> >> El 14/03/11 18:57, Templin, Fred L escribió: >>> Hi Marcelo (and Julien), >>> >>> In January, I posted several messages on a new approach to mobility >>> management known as IRON: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04529.html >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04535.html >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04543.html >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04546.html >>> >>> The base IRON architecture document has now been published as an >>> experimental RFC of the IRTF Routing Research Group: >>> >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6179.txt >>> >>> and the mechanisms and operational practices are documented in the >>> following active Internet drafts: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-vet >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-seal >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-ironmike-00 >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-iron-pm-00 >>> >>> I'd like to get a 20min MEXT slot at IETF80 to present the >>> approach. Please let me know if that works for you. >>> >>> Fred [email protected] >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of marcelo bagnulo >>>> braun Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 8:32 AM To: mext Subject: >>>> [MEXT] Agenda requests for Prague meeting >>>> >>>> Please send slot requests for the prague meeting to the chairs. >>>> please note that we are meeting on friday. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing >>>> list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list >> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >> > > _______________________________________________ > MEXT mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >