Hi,
In Beijing, many questions was about motivation for distribution of mobility management. So, worth to be discussed in Prague.
Pierrick
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de
> marcelo bagnulo braun
> Envoyé : mardi 22 mars 2011 15:53
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: [MEXT] FW: Agenda requests for Prague meeting
>
> so, you ave downgraded you statement of several itemS being non MIP
> related and all the DMM discussion being non MIP related to just one
> single agenda item... great, it seems we are making good progress here.
>
> about the particular item you mention: i understand this is the
> motivation for the dmm work and understanding the perceived probelms is
> needed to figure out how we can use MIP to deal with the perceived problem.
>
> However, if people think this is out of scope for MEXT, i am fine to
> discuss whether we should keep it in the agenda or not
>
>
>
>
>
> El 22/03/11 15:35, Alexandru Petrescu escribió:
> > Le 22/03/2011 15:06, marcelo bagnulo braun a écrit :
> >> Please point exactly what item in the agenda is NOT about the Mobile IP
> >> protocol.
> >
> > The 6th.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> El 20/03/11 15:13, Alexandru Petrescu escribió:
> >>> Marcelo, Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have a doubt about the reasoning behind declining Fred's request of
> >>> agenda item.
> >>>
> >>> The current agenda
> >>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/agenda/mext.txt
> >>>
> >>> contains items IMHO only remotely or very vaguely related to the
> Mobile
> >>> IPv6 protocol per se. Additionally, agenda's DMM core item has a
> >>> discussion which does not seem to converge on the use of Mobile IPv6.
> >>>
> >>> In this sense, I am not sure the typical statements of MEXT doing
> >>> _only_
> >>> Mobile IPv6 stuff holds any longer, as I see it today.
> >>>
> >>> Fred's "IRON and MOBIKE" draft-templin-ironmike-00.txt is related to
> >>> IKE
> >>> which is related to Mobile IPv6 security.
> >>>
> >>> I am not trying to advertise Fred's draft particularly. I am saying
> >>> this because...
> >>>
> >>> I have the same agenda problem with similar work I do (RA-based
> >>> routing)
> >>> for mobility, i.e. boxes which may run Mobile IPv6 but need something
> >>> else than Mobile IPv6 Type Codes.
> >>>
> >>> That is my doubt about MEXT activity and agenda planning, thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>> Le 14/03/2011 19:56, marcelo bagnulo braun a écrit :
> >>>> Hi Fred,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is outside the scope of the MEXT wg, which is limited to the the
> >>>> Mobile IPv6 protocol. Hence, we decline your request.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards, marcelo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> El 14/03/11 18:57, Templin, Fred L escribió:
> >>>>> Hi Marcelo (and Julien),
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In January, I posted several messages on a new approach to mobility
> >>>>> management known as IRON:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04529.html
> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04535.html
> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04543.html
> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04546.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The base IRON architecture document has now been published as an
> >>>>> experimental RFC of the IRTF Routing Research Group:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6179.txt
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and the mechanisms and operational practices are documented in the
> >>>>> following active Internet drafts:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-vet
> >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-seal
> >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-ironmike-00
> >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-iron-pm-00
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd like to get a 20min MEXT slot at IETF80 to present the
> >>>>> approach. Please let me know if that works for you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fred [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]
> >>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of marcelo bagnulo
> >>>>>> braun Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 8:32 AM To: mext Subject:
> >>>>>> [MEXT] Agenda requests for Prague meeting
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please send slot requests for the prague meeting to the chairs.
> >>>>>> please note that we are meeting on friday.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing
> >>>>>> list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list
> >>>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> MEXT mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MEXT mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MEXT mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.