Re: [MEXT] FW: Agenda requests for Prague meeting
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C9AE3A99.1221F%[email protected]> |
Alex, On 3/22/11 10:37 AM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu" <[email protected]> wrote: >Le 22/03/2011 15:52, marcelo bagnulo braun a écrit : >> so, you ave downgraded you statement of several itemS being non MIP >> related and all the DMM discussion being non MIP related to just one >> single agenda item... > >You asked one, I told one. > >Another is the 3rd item (HAC is not a Mobile IPv6 entity, TLS is not a >MIP6 Type Code, etc.) Over the past several meetings we have discussed the idea of creating alternate security frameworks for Mobile IPv6. The WG was rechartered subsequently. Please see the following in the charter: "The MEXT WG will also explore experimental alternative security mechanisms. " I-D draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-00.txt is a different security framework which uses HAC and TLS in its scope. -Raj