Re: [MEXT] Mobile IPv6 label and Mobile IPv6 protocol changes

Alex:

Let me get this straight:

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 22/03/2011 21:28, Julien Laganier a écrit :
>>
>> Alex:
>>
>> What is your point? You're not happy with the agenda? Please be
>> specific.
>
> Because I earlier requested in private to Chairs a 5min slot in the
> agenda and I did not receive reply, neither + nor -.
>
> I guess(?) the reason of no reply may be similar to what was replied
> publicly to Fred's request, hence my dissertation.  I may be wrong though.
>
> Now publicly I would like to request a 5min slot to present advancement
> of draft-petrescu-autoconf-ra-based-routing-01.txt
> which presents three new scenarios applicable to Vehicular
> communications which use RA-based routing on Mobile Routers which may be
> HA-less when no HA available, and run unmodified Mobile IPv6 when HA
> available.

Couple of points:

1. Your draft also doesn't correspond to any of this WG's deliverable.

2. If I am not mistaken you were already given a chance to present
this draft in a MEXT session, at which point nobody in the WG
expressed interest in it.

3. I also have double-checked my mailbox and I do not see any private
request to the chairs for a five minute slot to present this draft.
The only related thing I can see is a message _to the list_ announcing
a new version of your draft which isn't replying to Marcelo's call for
slot request. In this message you wrote "if deemed necessary, I would
be happy to present during a 5minute slot at the MEXT WG meeting in
Prague." Since nobody replied to you, I am assuming that nobody on
this list deemed necessary that you present again this draft in
Prague.

As a result, I am denying your request for a slot.

--julien