Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks
Pars Mutaf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:05 AM, QIU Ying <[email protected]> wrote: > This topic is interesting. > > > > But I am afraid that there is an efficient way to prevent this kind of DOS > attacks because the mobile node must wake up from sleep to receive and > process these required messages before simply drop them. > > > > Could you please provide more details? > > > Hi Ying, all, You can also find an example solution briefly described in the following I-D: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mutaf-dhoa-00 But protocols are necessary for securely distributing disposable home addresses to correspondent nodes. For further discussion you may subscribe to humanresolvers. Thanks, Pars > Regards > > Qiu Ying > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of > *Pars Mutaf > *Sent:* Monday, March 21, 2011 7:07 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks > > > > Some details that may not be obvious: > > The victim consumes energy for: > > - Receiving the messages (continuously waking up from sleep mode) > - Processing them and preparing reply packets (L2 and L3) > - Sending replies (L2 ACKs and upper layer replies e.g. SIP or TCP replies) > > Sending replies especially consumes more energy. It was shown that in > 802.11 sending 1 bit over the air consumes as much as executing 1,000 CPU > instructions. > > Regards, > > Pars > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Pars Mutaf <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I was wondering if solutions to energy consumption attacks on battery > powered mobile hosts would be of interest to IETF Mobile IPv6 community. > > The attack consists of sending frequent request packets e.g. SIP INVITE or > TCP SYN to a victim's home address. > > For example, experiments showed that the battery of a mobile phone with > 802.11 access can be remotely consumed in 3 hours (full battery). Attacks on > phones using an outdoor technology would result in more energy consumption > because of the longer distance to the base station. > > The victim becomes unusable. > > Regards, > > Pars > > > Institute for Infocomm Research disclaimer: "This email is confidential > and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete > it and notify us immediately. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose, > or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you." > _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext