Re: [MEXT] IETF-80 meeting minutes posted / clarifications on draft-liu-mext-distributed-mobile-ip
Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Romain, > > Hello Jan, > > On Apr 21, 2011, at 0:09, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > > From my point of view and how we are deploying mobility here it is desirable >(or for our case mandatory) for MN to use only one stable HoA at all times, not >many of them. At the same time it would be very nice to have multiple HAs, so >you could connect to nearest one and optimize the path. > > > > My thought was to anycast HA address where MN connects and deal with HoA >advertising on network side with dynamic routing protocols. > > You may have a look at Global HAHA: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wakikawa-mext-global-haha-spec-01 Thanks for pointing this out, I was almost reading another draft. I think Global HAHA is good, it solves almost all problems we have in DMM maybe the expense of introducing a fairly complicated protocol and a lot of configuration requirements. Regards, Behcet