Re: [MEXT] IETF-81

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Dear all,
I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?

Best regards
Dirk

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81

Hi Julien and all,

Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
"Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
will be needed.

Please take a look at the following I-D:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt

Thanks in advance for your support,
--
Hidetoshi

(2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
> Folks,
>
> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>
> --julien&  marcelo
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.