Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81

Hidetoshi Yokota <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Marcelo,

Since the agenda for IETF 81 has been fixed and the MEXT WG is not
scheduled there, it won't mean much whatever I say. My comment was
intended to describe the importance of a F2F meeting. I'll try to
encourage the discussion on the ML.

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2011/07/07 15:16), marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> below...
> 
> El 07/07/11 02:27, Hidetoshi Yokota escribió:
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> WG mailing list sometimes leads to a lengthy discussion, which creates 
>> misunderstandings and frustration that could be avoided if it was 
>> discussed in a F2F meeting.
> i agree
> please point out the lenghty discussion that ocurred in the mext ml 
> since the last IETF meeting that deserves f2f time to clarify the 
> misunderstanding that were generated.
> 
> 
>> Urgency is one important aspect but mutual understanding is another 
>> good aspect of F2F meeting. It is pity to miss such a precious 
>> opportunity for nothing in spite of a couple of very interesting I-Ds 
>> awaiting a good discussion...
>>
> Right, but having a meeting to discuss issues that people not care 
> enough to even comment in the ml, seems like a waste of time
> 
> Regards, marcelo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext


_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.