Re: [MEXT] IETF-81

Hi Dirk, Hi Alexandru

I am also interested in having a f2f meeting in Quebec to discuss
vehicular topics!

As I already understood, this meeting does not need to be seen as a MEXT
meeting.

Best regards,
Georgios

On 7/4/2011, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Dear all,
>I agree with Hidetoshi that the flow binding initiation draft should need more discussion - as well as DMM progress in the framework of MEXT and potentially the vehicular topics recently mentioned by Alex on this list.
>Wouldn't that qualify to include a WG session meeting in http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/?
>
>Best regards
>Dirk
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Hidetoshi Yokota
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:12
>An: [email protected]
>Betreff: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
>
>Hi Julien and all,
>
>Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
>"Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
>discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
>consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
>will be needed.
>
>Please take a look at the following I-D:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt
>
>Thanks in advance for your support,
>--
>Hidetoshi
>
>(2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
>> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
>>
>> --julien&  marcelo
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext