Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81

Hi Charlie and all,

I support your proposal. We already have a couple of interesting MEXT
related topics such as:

o DMM,
o vehicular communications, and
o network-initiated flow mobility.

Since there are multiple I-Ds on these topics, we should also discuss
how to move forward.

Regards,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2011/07/09 9:01), Charles E. Perkins wrote:
> Hello folks,
> 
> I agree that we should have a face-to-face meeting.
> Perhaps we can reserve one of the meeting rooms during
> a time when it is not in use, or else schedule a
> meeting in the evening somewhere.
> 
> There are several DMM drafts of interest which
> would benefit from discussion.
> 
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/8/2011 4:55 PM, Hidetoshi Yokota wrote:
>> Hi Marcelo,
>>
>> Since the agenda for IETF 81 has been fixed and the MEXT WG is not
>> scheduled there, it won't mean much whatever I say. My comment was
>> intended to describe the importance of a F2F meeting. I'll try to
>> encourage the discussion on the ML.
>>
>> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
>