Re: [MEXT] [dmm] novel research article about DMM
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25BC2EA032@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> |
Dear goodzi,
from the abstract and figures available at the links you provided it seems to me that PMIP and HIP achieve scores of +/- 1 regarding deployment, security, performance, and objective (whatever this means) ('nearly same performance, but HIP-based scheme got slightly better scores under evaluation criteria due to stronger security and fewer functional modules to deploy') - but I can't draw any conclusions for further extensions ... especially towards various DMM proposals as outlined in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuntz-dmm-summary-00
or/and
http://www.psg.com/~charliep/txt/ietf81/draft-perkins-dmm-matrix-00.txt
Would it be possible to extend your analysis method also to such new approaches under discussion?
Best regards
Dirk
________________________________
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Bokor Laszlo
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 12:45
An: dmm
Betreff: [dmm] novel research article about DMM
Dear Folks,
please let me advertise you a research paper in the area of DMM and future flat mobile networks:
Title: Evaluation of two integrated signalling schemes for the Ultra Flat Architecture using SIP, IEEE 802.21, and HIP/PMIP protocols
ACM link: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1975468
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.02.005
I hope you will find the above article interesting, and also that you will provide us with feedbacks on our work.
Best regards,
goodzi
--
László BOKOR
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME)
Department of Telecommunications (HIT) - Mobile Innovation Centre (MIK)
Tel: +36-1-463-3420, Fax: +36-1-463-3307
web: http://www.hit.bme.hu/~bokorl
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext