Re: [MEXT] [dmm] novel research article about DMM
Bokor Laszlo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPLDCSwmRozXXVEvN-ZGCd4yGrjhU5VPajYdG7rEUzz2gYBzbA@mail.gmail.com> |
Dear Behcet, many thanks for your suggestions. Best regards, goodzi -- László BOKOR Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) Department of Telecommunications (HIT) - Mobile Innovation Centre (MIK) Tel: +36-1-463-3420, Fax: +36-1-463-3307 web: http://www.hit.bme.hu/~bokorl 2011/7/16 Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> > Hi Laszlo, > A good pointer is Romain's draft at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuntz-dmm-summary-00 > > Regards, > > Behcet > >yes, we are planning to extend our analysis to new approaches and schemes > not > >yet examined. In this matter it would be great if you could point on some > >particular schemes which are worth dealing with from the WG's point of > view. > > > >Best regards, > >goodzi > > > >-- > >László BOKOR > >Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) > >Department of Telecommunications (HIT) - Mobile Innovation Centre (MIK) > >Tel: +36-1-463-3420, Fax: +36-1-463-3307 > >web: http://www.hit.bme.hu/%7Ebokorl > > > > > >2011/7/14 <[email protected]> > > > > > >>Dear goodzi, > >>from the abstract and figures available at the links you provided it > seems to > > >>me that PMIP and HIP achieve scores of +/- 1 regarding deployment, > security, > >>performance, and objective (whatever this means) ('nearly same > performance, > >>but > >>HIP-based scheme got slightly better scores under evaluation criteria due > to > >>stronger security and fewer functional modules to deploy') - but I can't > draw > >>any conclusions for further extensions ... especially towards various > DMM > >>proposals as outlined in > >> > >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuntz-dmm-summary-00 > >>or/andhttp:// > www.psg.com/~charliep/txt/ietf81/draft-perkins-dmm-matrix-00.txt<http://www.psg.com/%7Echarliep/txt/ietf81/draft-perkins-dmm-matrix-00.txt> > >>Would it be possible to extend your analysis method also to such new > >>approaches under discussion? > >> > >>Best regards > >>Dirk > >> > >> > ________________________________ > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von > Bokor > Laszlo > >>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 12:45 > >>An: dmm > >>Betreff: [dmm] novel research article about DMM > >> > >> > >>Dear Folks, > >> > >>please let me advertise you a research paper in the area of DMM and > future flat > >> > >>mobile networks: > >> > >>Title: Evaluation of two integrated signalling schemes for the Ultra > Flat > >>Architecture using SIP, IEEE 802.21, and HIP/PMIP protocols > >> > >>ACM link: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1975468 > >>DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.02.005 > >> > >>I hope you will find the above article interesting, and also that you > will > >>provide us with feedbacks on our work. > >> > >>Best regards, > >>goodzi > >> > >>-- > >>László BOKOR > >>Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) > >>Department of Telecommunications (HIT) - Mobile Innovation Centre (MIK) > >>Tel: +36-1-463-3420, Fax: +36-1-463-3307 > >>web: http://www.hit.bme.hu/~bokorl > >> > > > _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext