Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem withauthentication/etc. in wireless networks

"Charles E. Perkins" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Organization Wichorus Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Behcet,

On 8/31/2011 8:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> Maybe we are overreacting.
> IPv6 has not picked up yet, currently IPv6 traffic seems to be less
> than 2% of IPv4 traffic.

That's less than 0.2%.  It's pitiful.


> More time is needed for IPv6 deployment which could be followed by
> IPv6 mobility deployment.

More time is needed for deployment, but we are
behind on what is needed for standardization.

As I discussed before, unless we provide a credible
alternative, we are looking forward to extraordinarily
complicated and rickety systems (per application!)
(per RAT!) that have high operational expense.
It does not at all bode well for the end-users
(e.g., you and me).

We ought to act ASAP.

Regards,
Charlie P.


>> Hello Behcet,
>>
>> On 8/29/2011 11:32 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>>
>>>   Folks, let's get back to what was decided in IETF 81 Wednesday morning
>> meeting.
>>
>> O.K.  Which part do you think we should discuss first?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Charlie P.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.