Re: [MEXT] [!! SPAM] Re: Well-known problem with authentication/etc. in wireless networks

Pete McCann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CACvMsLHmUvkHXj49AirrQPYk-t+8qde6ak-fUhiDDgsTH45VmA@mail.gmail.com>
Julien,

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Julien Laganier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Charlie,
>
> Mutual authentication between the MN and the HA is only required at
> binding creation to set-up the MIPv6 security association that is
> keyed with the Home Address; the same security association is then
> used to protect further binding updates. Thus there is no
> serialization of authentication used for network access and MIPv6.

Many of the DMM proposals seem to contemplate getting a new HA
upon every new attachment to the network.  It seems to me that it
would be in scope to consider optimization of the setup of the security
association with the newly met HA and that this could somehow leverage
the network access authentication that has just taken place.

-Pete
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.