Re: [MEXT] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt

Julien Laganier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <CAE_dhjt_bOj=but86a7ML1OaEH+P6yHuh8BHCGO9233KM-u2iw@mail.gmail.com>
Looks good. Thanks, Raj.

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:12 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Fair enough. We will modify the statements in the I-D. Proposals below:
>
> On 9/13/11 9:29 AM, "ext Julien Laganier" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I don' t think either of these statements are appropriate:
>>
>>- "The IPsec/IKEv2 based security architectures makes implementation
>>and deployment of the protocol infeasible for numerous reasons."
>>
>>It has been implemented, thus it is factually incorrect to state that
>>implementation is infeasible.
>
> Just delete this statement.
>
>>
>>- "This document updates RFC 6275 and proposes an alternate security
>>framework."
>>
>>No, it does not. This document is not on the standard track.
>
> This document proposes an alternate security framework for Mobile IPv6 and
> Dual-stack Mobile IPv6.
>
> -Raj
>
>>
>>--julien
>>
>>On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:22 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>directories. This draft is a work item of the Mobility EXTensions for
>>>IPv6 Working Group of the IETF.
>>>
>>>        Title           : Transport Layer Security-based Mobile IPv6
>>>Security Framework for Mobile Node to Home Agent Communication
>>>        Author(s)       : Jouni Korhonen
>>>                          Basavaraj Patil
>>>                          Hannes Tschofenig
>>>                          Dirk Kroeselberg
>>>        Filename        : draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>>        Pages           : 38
>>>        Date            : 2011-09-13
>>>
>>>   RFC 6275 Mobile IPv6 signaling between the mobile node and home agent
>>>   is secured using IPsec.  The security association between a mobile
>>>   node and the home agent is established using IKEv1 or IKEv2.  The
>>>   security model specified for Mobile IPv6, which relies on IKE/IPsec,
>>>   requires interaction between the Mobile IPv6 protocol part of the IP
>>>   stack and the IKE/IPsec part of the IP stack.  The IPsec/IKEv2 based
>>>   security architectures makes implementation and deployment of the
>>>   protocol infeasible for numerous reasons.  This document updates RFC
>>>   6275 and proposes an alternate security framework, which relies on
>>>   Transport Layer Security for establishing keying material and other
>>>   bootstrapping parameters required to protect Mobile IPv6 signaling
>>>   and data traffic between the mobile node and home agent.
>>>
>>>
>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>MEXT mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.