Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group

Hello Behcet,


On 11/4/2011 9:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> I am confused about all these very high level, intelligent looking
> comments, and I must say I am fed up with them :-).

- I'm guessing you don't wish to restrict to only stupid comments.
- Do you mean that only low-level comments are of interest?
   That doesn't seem appropriate in response to the proposal to
   shut down the working group...?

> Non-tunneled communications is already there in DMM. You connect to the
> nearest HA and all new communications is non-tunneled.

That doesn't provide IP address continuity, does it?

> Do we agree that we should differentiate client-based and network based
> protocols and discuss them in different places?

If I understand your point, this is the status quo, right?

> or even there is no issue for one.

I did not understand the point of that.

> I think this is what we should decide now.

I'm not sure what "this" means in your sentence.

Regards,
Charlie P.