Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group

I agree with this scope.

Pierrick

> 
> IMHO I see no reason to focus only on client-based or network-based
> solutions. FWIW the DMM solution space:
> 
> o is incremental to an existing IETF mobility protocol, be that
client-,
>   network- or even transport-based.
> o or alternatively may not depend on a specific mobility protocol at
all
>   i.e. non-anchored solution is also in scope.
> o solution is backward compatible in a sense that if a host or a
network
>   does not support DMM, nothing breaks.
> o focuses on IPv6 because anything IPv4 is just NAT-games.
> 
> - Jouni
>