Re: [MEXT] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6276 (3078)

I agree with this Errata : the HA is always at home and the figure title
should say "Signaling sequence for the case the Mobile Router is at
home" (and not HA at home).

Alex

Le 05/01/2012 11:24, RFC Errata System a écrit :
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6276,
> "DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6276&eid=3078
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Sofiane IMADALI<[email protected]>
>
> Section: 3.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the home agent is at home
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the Mobile Router is at home
>
> Notes
> -----
> The figure name is not corresponding to the section's name. In addition, the home agent is always at home.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6276 (draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)
> Publication Date    : July 2011
> Author(s)           : R. Droms, P. Thubert, F. Dupont, W. Haddad, C. Bernardos
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>