Re: Comment on Req2 transparency for DMM

H Anthony,

Yes, this reflects Sri's and my suggestion about removal of MN/MR
qualifier.  I agree with the idea of the new text as you put it.

Then, if I re-read just like that, there still seems to be some
difficulty to my brain to understand:

Le 01/08/2012 23:35, h chan a écrit :
> The DMM solutions MUST provide transparency above the IP layer when
> needed, such as upon change of point of attachment to the Internet,
> for the application flows that cannot cope with a change of IP
> address. Otherwise the support to maintain a stable home IP address
> or prefix during handover may be declined.

I don't understand the last phrase - the 'otherwise' relates to the
first MUST?  Or to the latter 'cannot'?

But this may be just nitpicking on the use of language.  I agree with
the direction of the idea and thank you for having provided the
modification.

Alex