Re: Comments on DMM Gap Analysis.

Wesley Eddy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Organization MTI Systems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 9/19/2012 12:14 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> I agree.
> 
> I also suggest that we do not take cloud networks lightly.
> Operator cloud networks are there already and it is spreading fast,
> and I can say that soon it is going to cover all operators worldwide
> soon.
> 
> We should not ignore that fact that mobility entities will be in the
> cloud. Also many entities we thought they were far away, with cloud
> networks they will become neighbors in IPv6 sense.
> 
> I suggest that gap analysis should take into account the cloud.
> 


I think you'll need to be more specific about what you call
an operator cloud network.

If it is just services hosted within the operator network,
I doubt that there's value in using the word "cloud".  To
the mobile node and rest of the infrastructure how a service
is provided above layer-3 should not be of concern.

As far as mobile nodes being part of a cloud, that's a
totally different problem, is it not?  I doubt that should
be in scope here.  DMM is hard enough without bringing
this in.

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.