Re: Comments on DMM Gap Analysis.

Hi Charlie,

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Charles E. Perkins
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Behcet,
>
> I'm very curious:
>
>
> On 9/26/2012 1:08 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>
>> With the cloud, two mobility entities may now become IPv6 neighbors in the
>> cloud. Trying to define signaling between such entities maybe no longer a
>> big issue. With cloud, DMM's premise somewhat disappears. We need to find a
>> new premise.
>
>
> How is it that the mobility entities are "more neighborly" than they would
> be
> in physical IPv6 networks?
>
> How would there be information about whether the mobility entities
> are in the same cloud or different clouds?
>

In case of cloud networks, this is the only case we have to worry
about. In dmm it is always the case.
That is the difference.

> I do think that clouds are interesting, but it's not immediately obvious
> to me how they change the fundamental nature of the DMM problem.
>

Of course it would :-).

Regards,

Behcet