Re: comments on draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-02
h chan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6E31144C030982429702B11D6746B98C364A041B__18915.8584144481$1356130729$gmane$org@SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com> |
Revised REQ4:
REQ4: Existing mobility protocols
A DMM solution SHOULD first consider reusing and extending
IETF-standardized protocols before specifying new protocols.
H Anthony Chan
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of jouni korhonen
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [DMM] comments on draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-02
In Section 4.4:
o I would just remove the sentence:
"Motivation: Using IETF protocols is easier to deploy and to
update." IMHO it brings no additional clarity what has already been
said.