Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document

Hi all,

I support [1] (draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03) as WG document adoption. It
has specified current practices well in details, analyzing gaps and
limitations. I hope we'll able to progress the rest of DMM items.

Regards,
Seil

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni
Korhonen
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Julien Laganier
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
analysis" document


Folks,

Just a reminder that ~one more week time to voice your preference!

- Jouni


On Dec 20, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <[email protected]>
wrote:
> 
>> Dear chairs,
>> 
>> We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis, 
>> addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the 
>> last meeting. Main changes from -02 are:
>> 
>> - New section on 3GPP mobility.
>> - New section on functional analysis.
>> - New section on combined solution analysis.
>> - Several fixes and clean-ups.
>> 
>> We'd like to ask the chairs to replace [1] below with the new 
>> revision (draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03), that we have just submitted.
> 
> 
> This is OK. Consider -03 as the document [1] for the adoption call.
> 
> - Jouni & Julien.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Carlos
>> 
>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 22:25 +0200, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for
that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis"
document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two
documents on this topic to choose from:
>>> 
>>> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [2] 
>>> draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
>>> 
>>> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for
the WG document.
>>> 
>>> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing
list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner justification
for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is (rough) consensus
from active WG participants to proceed with selecting one document against
the other. 
>>> 
>>> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a
longer three week call now due the holiday season in between.
>>> 
>>> - Jouni & Julien
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> 

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm