Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document

Dear all,

I support [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01, which provides
clear current practices of IP mobility protocols and gap analysis.

Cheers.

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for
> that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis"
> document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two
> documents on this topic to choose from:
>
> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02
> [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
>
> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for
> the WG document.
>
> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing
> list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner justification
> for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is (rough) consensus
> from active WG participants to proceed with selecting one document against
> the other.
>
> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a
> longer three week call now due the holiday season in between.
>
> - Jouni & Julien
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>



-- 
RSM Department, TELECOM Bretagne, France
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random

#email: jonghyouk (at) gmail (dot) com
#webpage: http://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm