Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document

Hello folks,

I support document [2] and some beneficial contents of [1], I think, can be
merged to [2]
Thank you.

BRs,
Heeyoung JUNG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Jouni Korhonen
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Julien Laganier
> Subject: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
> analysis" document
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for
> that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis"
> document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider
> two documents on this topic to choose from:
> 
> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02
> [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
> 
> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for
> the WG document.
> 
> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing
> list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner
> justification for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is
> (rough) consensus from active WG participants to proceed with selecting
> one document against the other.
> 
> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a
> longer three week call now due the holiday season in between.
> 
> - Jouni & Julien
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm