Re: Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document

Hi all,

As for the current discussion on adopting a "current practices and gap analysis" document,
I express my support to [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03. It seems to me that it is 
a better base document for the group.

Cheers,
Rui Costa






|-----Original Message-----
|From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
|Jouni Korhonen
|Sent: jueves, 03 de enero de 2013 13:05
|To: [email protected]
|Cc: Julien Laganier
|Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap 
|analysis" document
|
|
|Folks,
|
|Just a reminder that ~one more week time to voice your preference!
|
|- Jouni
|
|
|On Dec 20, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:
|
|>
|> On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
|<[email protected]> wrote:
|>
|>> Dear chairs,
|>>
|>> We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis, 
|>> addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the 
|>> last meeting. Main changes from -02 are:
|>>
|>> - New section on 3GPP mobility.
|>> - New section on functional analysis.
|>> - New section on combined solution analysis.
|>> - Several fixes and clean-ups.
|>>
|>> We'd like to ask the chairs to replace [1] below with the new 
|>> revision (draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03), that we have just
|submitted.
|>
|>
|> This is OK. Consider -03 as the document [1] for the adoption call.
|>
|> - Jouni & Julien.
|>
|>
|>
|>
|>>
|>> Thanks!
|>>
|>> Carlos
|>>
|>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 22:25 +0200, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
|>>> Folks,
|>>>
|>>> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies
|for that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap 
|analysis" document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We 
|consider two documents on this topic to choose from:
|>>>
|>>> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [2]
|>>> draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
|>>>
|>>> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the 
|>>> _basis_
|for the WG document.
|>>>
|>>> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the
|mailing list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner 
|justification for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is
|(rough) consensus from active WG participants to proceed with selecting 
|one document against the other.
|>>>
|>>> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We
|have a longer three week call now due the holiday season in between.
|>>>
|>>> - Jouni & Julien
|>>> _______________________________________________
|>>> dmm mailing list
|>>> [email protected]
|>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
|>>
|>>
|>> _______________________________________________
|>> dmm mailing list
|>> [email protected]
|>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
|>
|
|_______________________________________________
|dmm mailing list
|[email protected]
|https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm