Re: Implementations of RFC 4285
"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Hesham, Yes. We do have implementations and field deployments based on 4285. Its supported on number of platforms supporting mobile routers/home agent and also a variant used between MAG and LMA. Regards Sri On 1/23/13 5:53 AM, "Hesham Soliman" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi all, > >I was discussing this with Brian off-line and thought the list might know >more. Does anyone know of RFC 4285 implementations? > >The reason I ask is that it seems we have a conflict in an error code >(144) interpretation between RFCs 5555 and 4285. Obviously 5555 shouldn't >have used error code 144 for that purpose but it slipped passed us all it >seems. So, it would be good to know if there are any 4285 implementations >out there to see if there is a problem already in practice between the two >RFCs. > >Thanks, >Hesham > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >dmm mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm