Re: Implementations of RFC 4285

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
No, we don't have support for RFC5555 on our mobile router; Probably this
code is relevant only on the receiver end. On the HA side, on one of the
platforms there seems to be support for both. I have to check if this code
if tunnel negotiation is implemented or not, and if the implementation is
sending 144 for both the error cases.

You may also want to check with Romain Kuntz, who did the open source
DSMIP implementation. With Ryuju as well for Toyota ITC.

We need to update RFC5555. There goes the perfect number Hesham :)



Regards
Sri





On 1/28/13 4:47 AM, "Hesham Soliman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Thanks Sri, 
>
>Do you implement error code 144? Has there been any issues with your RFC
>5555 implementation (if you have an implementation of course)?
>
>Hesham 
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[email protected]>
>Date: Monday, 28 January 2013 7:17 PM
>To: Hesham Soliman <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
><[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [DMM] Implementations of RFC 4285
>
>>Hi Hesham,
>>
>>Yes. We do have implementations and field deployments based on 4285. Its
>>supported on number of platforms supporting mobile routers/home agent and
>>also a variant used between MAG and LMA.
>>
>>Regards
>>Sri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 1/23/13 5:53 AM, "Hesham Soliman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>I was discussing this with Brian off-line and thought the list might
>>>know
>>>more. Does anyone know of RFC 4285 implementations?
>>>
>>>The reason I ask is that it seems we have a conflict in an error code
>>>(144) interpretation between RFCs 5555 and 4285. Obviously 5555
>>>shouldn't
>>>have used error code 144 for that purpose but it slipped passed us all
>>>it
>>>seems. So, it would be good to know if there are any 4285
>>>implementations
>>>out there to see if there is a problem already in practice between the
>>>two
>>>RFCs.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Hesham
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>dmm mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.