Re: WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03

Hi Seil,



What is the issue with Section 4.7?

Do we need to modify it, or is a requirement related multicast excluded from what the DMM WG needs to focus on?



Best regards,

Georgios

________________________________
Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Seil Jeon [[email protected]]
Verzonden: woensdag 3 april 2013 22:26
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [DMM] WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03

Hi Behcet and all,

With regards to what you said, I believe it was already answered several times in the list while it was made.

Regards,

Seil

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:59 PM
To: Jouni Korhonen
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03

Hi all,

If Section 4.7 is removed, I am willing to support this call.

The reason: it is immature to say anything on this issue even as a should.

Regards,

Behcet

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Just a reminder. There has been zero WGLC reviews so far..

- Jouni


On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> This mail starts a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03.
> The issues, even editorials, should be recorded into the Issue Tracker
> for a control tracking whether everything has been addressed. We
> require minimum three reviews. The more the better, though.
>
> The WGLC ends on Wednesday 3rd April.
>
> - Jouni & Julien

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm