Re: WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03
Stig Venaas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/4/2013 11:23 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > Folks, > > I hope you as a WG realise we are stuck with the next steps > and possible future work/rechartering etc until we get some > of the existing milestones completed. That involves: FWIW, the document looks good to me. I know the WGLC has ended though, and I haven't followed the discussions in the wg as closely as I should, so I don't know how well it matches the view of the group. Stig > 1) getting requirements out of the WG > 2) getting the gap analysis into the state that we can > really pinpoint the gaps that cannot be solved with > current deployment practises > > Recruiting people outside the (plentiful) authors to do a > proper review (i.e., a bit more challenging than a one liner) > should not be an overwhelming task.. The DMM list itself has > 795 members. > > - Jouni & Julien > > > On Apr 4, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Folk, >> >> Due the lack of feedback, the I-D did not pass the WGLC. We'll >> initiate another one soon. >> >> - Jouni >> >> >> On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Just a reminder. There has been zero WGLC reviews so far.. >>> >>> - Jouni >>> >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> This mail starts a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03. >>>> The issues, even editorials, should be recorded into the Issue Tracker >>>> for a control tracking whether everything has been addressed. We >>>> require minimum three reviews. The more the better, though. >>>> >>>> The WGLC ends on Wednesday 3rd April. >>>> >>>> - Jouni & Julien >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >