Re: WGLC #2 starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03

Hello folks,

I have many editorial comments which I will submit later today.

However, I think the draft has a major organizational problem. Namely,
the "problem statements", instead of being properly collected together
in an initial section, are sprinkled in along with various statements of
requirements.

I remember there was previously a problem statement draft that
enumerated the PSs in the current requirements draft.  I think it is
O.K. (perhaps not optimal, but O.K.) for the problem statements to
be in the requirements draft, but not as currently situated.

This, along with the various other editorial clarifications that are
needed, lead me to believe that the draft is not yet ready, but I do
not think that there are major problems, and that the next draft
probably could be ready for advancement.

Regards,
Charlie P.