Re: requirements and the security considerations
Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9F98D456-0471-422D-B170-D4606ADB363D__12394.5445091978$1372190883$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
> By taking into account two comments, the revised text is as follows. > > REQ7: DMM SHOULD consider multicast early so that solutions can > > be developed not only to provide IP mobility to keep IP multicast sessions when it is needed, but to avoid network inefficiency issues in multicast > traffic delivery (such as duplicate multicast subscriptions > towards the downstream tunnel entitiesy). The multicast solutions > should therefore avoid restricting the management of all IP > multicast traffic to a single host through a dedicated > (tunnel) interface on multicast-capable access routers. > > Motivation: Existing multicast deployment have been introduced after completing the design of the reference mobility protocol, then optimization and extensions have been followed, by “patching-up” procedure, thus leading to network inefficiency and non-optimal routing. The multicast solutions should therefore be required to consider efficiency nature in multicast traffic delivery. > The above would work for me.. at least better than the current text in the I-D. - Jouni