Re: requirements and the security considerations

Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <9F98D456-0471-422D-B170-D4606ADB363D__12394.5445091978$1372190883$gmane$org@gmail.com>
> By taking into account two comments, the revised text is as follows.
> 
> REQ7: DMM SHOULD consider multicast early so that solutions can
> 
> be developed not only to provide IP mobility to keep IP multicast sessions when it is needed, but to avoid network inefficiency issues in multicast
> traffic delivery (such as duplicate multicast subscriptions
> towards the downstream tunnel entitiesy). The multicast solutions
> should therefore avoid restricting the management of all IP
> multicast traffic to a single host through a dedicated
> (tunnel) interface on multicast-capable access routers.
> 
> Motivation: Existing multicast deployment have been introduced after completing the design of the reference mobility protocol, then optimization and extensions have been followed, by “patching-up” procedure, thus leading to network inefficiency and non-optimal routing. The multicast solutions should therefore be required to consider efficiency nature in multicast traffic delivery.
> 

The above would work for me.. at least better than the current text
in the I-D.

- Jouni
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.