Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-matsushima-stateless-uplane-vepc-00.txt

Peter McCann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <5963DDF1F751474D8DEEFDCDBEE43AE716F4F97F@dfweml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Hi, Satoru,

Satoru Matsushima wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Le 16/07/2013 16:27, Peter McCann a écrit :
> 
> 
> 		Satoru Matsushima wrote:
> 
> 
> 			Hi Peter,
> 
> 			On 2013/07/16, at 3:49, Peter McCann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 				I guess I don't understand the "PDN Prefix" and "subnet ID" fields
> 				that you have in Figure 4.  You state:
> 
> 				   Each PDN is assumed to have single or several prefixes (called
> PDN 				   prefix) used to generate UE's address. Followed by the PDN
> prefix in 				   Figure 4, there is 16-bit TEID assigned for a UE's
> session at SGW on 				   the control plane.  TEID is 16 bits identifier
> in GTP header to 				   distinguish each bearer.  The remaining bits are
> filled by subnet ID. 				   The prefix is allocated per UE and used for
> address assignment by 				   SLAAC or DHCPv6. 				Is Figure 4 supposed
> to be the Next Hop or the Destination?  I assumed 				it was Next Hop
> because it has the TEID encoded in it.  However, some 				of the above
> paragraph leads me to believe it is about the UE's user 				plane IP
> address.
> 
> 
> 
> 			The figure 4 illustrates UE's prefix so it shows the destination.
> 			Encoding TEID is just a seed to create UE's prefix in the
> stateless-pd 			manner.
> 
> 
> 		Doesn't the TEID change on every eNB handover?  I thought the UE's
> prefix 		should remain constant across handovers.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you use stateless-pd rule for UE's prefix generation, the embedded 
> TEID is SGW assigned one. So the delegated prefix is stable during 
> across eNB handover. Please see the section 3.3 in update version of 
> the draft. Anycast routing no longer requires hand-over between SGW in 
> virtualized EPC.
> 
> 
> 
> 	Yes TEID changes on handover and when UE exits Idle-Mode (it has 
> previously entered).
> 
> 
> Thanks, we haven't mention about in the case of Idle-Mode exit. will 
> update with it in a next version. It would be in control-plane 
> awareness section.

I think taken together, these facts would mean that the TEID space is
shared across all EPC-E devices (they all have the same anycast address)
and also that a TEID would need to remain allocated even to idle UEs.

Would you eventually run out of TEID space?

> 			We hasn't illustrate yet how to encode the TEID in next-hop. 			But
> as we mentioned in the document, we expect BGP remote next-hop as 			the
> way to encode it in the sub-TLV of the remote next-hop attribute.
> 
> 
> 		I would think that the Next-Hop would change on mobility events, but
> the 		Destination would remain the same (UE prefix).  Why is this not
> the case?
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, exactly.

Ok, so the Destination IPv6 address needs to remain the same during the lifetime
of a UE session, even across idle transitions and mobility events, right?

-Pete
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.