Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-matsushima-stateless-uplane-vepc-00.txt
Peter McCann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5963DDF1F751474D8DEEFDCDBEE43AE716F4F97F@dfweml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> |
Hi, Satoru, Satoru Matsushima wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 16/07/2013 16:27, Peter McCann a écrit : > > > Satoru Matsushima wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > On 2013/07/16, at 3:49, Peter McCann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I guess I don't understand the "PDN Prefix" and "subnet ID" fields > that you have in Figure 4. You state: > > Each PDN is assumed to have single or several prefixes (called > PDN prefix) used to generate UE's address. Followed by the PDN > prefix in Figure 4, there is 16-bit TEID assigned for a UE's > session at SGW on the control plane. TEID is 16 bits identifier > in GTP header to distinguish each bearer. The remaining bits are > filled by subnet ID. The prefix is allocated per UE and used for > address assignment by SLAAC or DHCPv6. Is Figure 4 supposed > to be the Next Hop or the Destination? I assumed it was Next Hop > because it has the TEID encoded in it. However, some of the above > paragraph leads me to believe it is about the UE's user plane IP > address. > > > > The figure 4 illustrates UE's prefix so it shows the destination. > Encoding TEID is just a seed to create UE's prefix in the > stateless-pd manner. > > > Doesn't the TEID change on every eNB handover? I thought the UE's > prefix should remain constant across handovers. > > > > > If you use stateless-pd rule for UE's prefix generation, the embedded > TEID is SGW assigned one. So the delegated prefix is stable during > across eNB handover. Please see the section 3.3 in update version of > the draft. Anycast routing no longer requires hand-over between SGW in > virtualized EPC. > > > > Yes TEID changes on handover and when UE exits Idle-Mode (it has > previously entered). > > > Thanks, we haven't mention about in the case of Idle-Mode exit. will > update with it in a next version. It would be in control-plane > awareness section. I think taken together, these facts would mean that the TEID space is shared across all EPC-E devices (they all have the same anycast address) and also that a TEID would need to remain allocated even to idle UEs. Would you eventually run out of TEID space? > We hasn't illustrate yet how to encode the TEID in next-hop. But > as we mentioned in the document, we expect BGP remote next-hop as the > way to encode it in the sub-TLV of the remote next-hop attribute. > > > I would think that the Next-Hop would change on mobility events, but > the Destination would remain the same (UE prefix). Why is this not > the case? > > > > Yes, exactly. Ok, so the Destination IPv6 address needs to remain the same during the lifetime of a UE session, even across idle transitions and mobility events, right? -Pete