Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.txt

Alper Yegin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Dapeng,

>       Multiple IP address management: ability of the mobile node to
>       simultaneously use multiple IP addresses and select the best one
>       (from an anchoring point of view) to use on a per-session/
>       application/service basis.  Depending on the mobile node support,
>       this functionality might require more or less support from the
>       network side.  This is typically the role of a connection manager.
> 
> I'm not sure if this is really a connection manager issue. This is more of a source address selection issue.
> 
> [Dapeng] Yes, application and OS protocol stack can also take the role of choosing source IP address. We will update this statement accordingly. 


Alper> OK. But I still don't think connection manager does that. As far as I know, connection manager deals with choosing which network the IP stack should connect. Does it also control which one of the multiple IP addresses available on the IP stack is chosen by the applications when they connect()/sendmsg(), etc.?


> 
>        Mobility management and traffic redirection should only be
>        triggered due to IP mobility reasons, that is when the MN moves
>        from the point of attachment where the IP flow was originally
>        initiated.
> 
> Mobility management and traffic redirection may also be triggered due to load balancing. Maybe we should acknowledge such non-mobility related triggers, and state that they are outside the scope of this document.
> 
> [Dapeng] I am not sure whether there is a case that mobility management is triggered due to load balancing. Could you help to give an example?

Alper> I was referring to forcing the MN to change its HA when the currently used HA is overloaded. 


>  
> 
> Should we described the terms IP session continuity and IP address reachability? This document is solely focusing on the former, we should state that.
> 
> [Dapeng] For "IP address reachability", you mean the case that session is initiated from Internet toward to the MN?

Alper> Yes.

> I am not sure whether it should be in the scope of mobility management. For example, RFC5555 does not discuss this case.

Alper> It's part of "mobility management". Mobile IP and its variants support that. 
The case where it is not supported is when the home address keeps changing (e.g., dynamically anchoring and re-anchoring) -- in which case the MN does not have stable IP address to stay "reachable". 

> 
> When doing the gap analysis, we better break down the benefits we are seeking and evaluate existing solutions with respect to them (e.g., signaling reduction, use of most direct data-path, etc. ). For example, regular use of HMIP helps with the former, but not the latter. But, using RCoA as source address helps with both (but it has other issues -- when MN moves outside the local domain).
>  
> [Dapeng] We already done that in section 5.2. Do you have more column want to add in table 1?

Alper> Dapeng, I don't see section 5.2 or table 1 in http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.txt

Alper


> 
> Thanks,
> Dapeng Liu
>     
> 
> Alper
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Liu Dapeng wrote:
> 
>> Hello folks:
>> 
>> To make good progress in Berlin meeting, it is better for us to start
>> discussion and resolve comments in the list now. Please help to review
>> and feel free to send comments.
>> 
>> quick summary of the draft:
>> -----
>> Section 4 'DMM practice' mainly analyses the mobility deployment
>> practice in WLAN and 3GPP network. Both client-based and network-based
>> mobility protocols are discussed.
>> 
>> Section 5 'Gap analysis' tentatively discusses the gaps. Please have a
>> look whether you agree on those gaps and whether you want to propose
>> any new ones. Any input from the group will be welcomed.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dapeng Liu
>> 
>> 2013/6/17 Zuniga, Juan Carlos <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We have posted an updated version of the current practices and gap analysis draft. We would like to make one more update before Berlin, so your comments and feedback are very welcome.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Juan Carlos et al.
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 11:07 AM
>>> To: Carlos J. Bernardos; H Anthony Chan; Zuniga, Juan Carlos; Anthony Chan; Dapeng Liu; Zuniga, Juan Carlos; Pierrick Seite
>>> Subject: New Version Notification fordraft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.txt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Dapeng Liu and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> Filename:        draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis
>>> Revision:        01
>>> Title:           Distributed Mobility Management: Current practices and gap analysis
>>> Creation date:   2013-06-17
>>> Group:           dmm
>>> Number of pages: 21
>>> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01.txt
>>> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis
>>> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
>>> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>>   The present document analyses deplyment practices of existing
>>>   mobility protocols in a distributed mobility management environment.
>>>   It also identifies some limitations compared to the expected
>>>   functionality of a fully distributed mobility management system.  The
>>>   comparison is made taking into account the identified DMM
>>>   requirements.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> ------
>> Best Regards,
>> Dapeng Liu
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ------
> Best Regards,
> Dapeng Liu

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.