Re: issue tracker and the requirements draft
h chan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6E31144C030982429702B11D6746B98C370950F8__14595.4930143946$1375110772$gmane$org@szxeml557-mbx.china.huawei.com> |
As I go through the list, Issue #22 on multicast had already been satisfactorily addressed in email. I am going to put the resolution in version 06 so that it can be closed with version 06. Issue #29 on security had also been discussed in email. The revised text from Jong-Hyeouk had tried to address the security requirement for DMM, and included security consideration discussion in the motivation, so that a separate clause on Security consideration is no longer necessary. Alternatively, the general security discussion for DMM in the motivation can move to the Security consideration session, leaving a small part in the motivation that is most relevant to the security requirement. Please continue to discuss the resolution to this issue. The remaining issues #33 to #40 also had already been discussed in email discussion and the recommended text had already been incorporated. That is all the remaining issues I can see. H Anthony Chan -----Original Message----- From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:03 AM To: [email protected] Cc: h chan Subject: issue tracker and the requirements draft <as a chair> Folks, The requirements draft still seems to have 11 open tickets: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dmm/trac/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&component=requirements Those who recorded the issues should check whether -05 addresses them. - Jouni