comment on draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F3BB072__17243.4438173243$1375343945$gmane$org@EXMBX23.ad.utwente.nl> 
Hi,



In this email I am repeting the comment that I had today on the mike:



The current version of the draft is not using the requirements defined in the requirements draft to identify the gaps on existing mobility protocols.

In my opinion it is important to use these requirements in order to identify the gaps.



Best regards,

Georgios

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.