Re: Draft on PMIP Localized Routing for traffic offloading

Peter McCann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <5963DDF1F751474D8DEEFDCDBEE43AE716F52B15__12163.380199536$1375443049$gmane$org@dfweml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Hi, Alex,

I definitely think this technique could be used within a WiFi access
network as the MN changes from one AP/AR to another.  However, it is
not clear whether the WiFi APs would be attached to the same I-BGP
system as the cellular base stations.  If they are, then great, I 
think it would work.  However, if there are radically different backhaul
topologies for WiFi and cellular it might be necessary to have two
different I-BGP domains and use a global mobility protocol for preserving
an address between cellular and Wifi (I think client-based MIP is good 
for this).

I personally think the PMIP-based LR solutions are kind of ugly.

-Pete

Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Seeing the presentation of Ryuji in intarea on the use of BGP to
> realize mobility in the context of a cellular operator, draft-
> matsushima-stateless-uplane-vepc-01, it makes wonder:
> 
> - could this be used outside the context of a cellular operator?  Or
>    within the cellular operator, but for WiFi offloading?
> Because we have a draft for WiFi offloading or traffic control for
> other reasosn, submitted as Localized Routing for PMIPv6:
> 
>             draft-boc-netext-lr-roext-05.txt
> Alex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.