Re: Preparing for DMM future steps and rechartering

Hi Pete,
     Speaking with no hat on...

On 11/12/13 4:29 PM, Peter McCann wrote:
> Hi, Sri,
> 
> Even if we agree that those services are necessary (and I would point out
> once again that most of them are not beneficial to the end-user) I don't
> think we should be architecting the network in such a way that we lose the
> basic benefits of IP (shortest path routing and fault-tolerance).  We can
> implement those services without taking all the packets to a central location;
> maybe just the first packet or meta-information about the first packet can
> be taken to an SDN controller that can make some decision and pass it down
> to the user plane.
> 
> I really don't think this is such fantastic science-fiction. ;)

The degree to which this is science fiction really depends on what scope
you think these host routes will have in the routing system.

* Are you assuming mobility within a single enterprise or Autonomous System?

* Limited mobility within a consortium of networks?

* Is this global mobility for any/all nodes?

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSg5oiAAoJEBOZRqCi7goqCLMH/0iv0yw+av7eZ7KwJ3mrEgpz
x4OBzOuUqUVz8p7Bes0wzfqEnULhDBHydm75P8SyS0wn2rK6xVP8oNoeKfrx0qRf
Amm9aDj0ttZImMdpZOcNA0evZA2pwb7deySeb9k/bVV/9Nm+d/HF2Th7tZ6DehAG
4YayDCHAoRFF+wZ2Ju8ZQszEbbCw5hs8gCahUNe00Jxx2VN3dvyHIMbmHfIJlT3d
MHsx6OPnj7DpjuAt8Zn1sIVVN3SV/+7RkkmlJz8rZwWr5AWqTLfz8XzNfq+kZlFK
7Uh7030urfDD3XLt9ecph+eEtaw4hrIcSv1Dj995PUf4efI8fl1I2FppjAEcnQU=
=bfEo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----