Re: tunnels-vs-host routes and other DMM components
Peter McCann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5963DDF1F751474D8DEEFDCDBEE43AE7182E25B1@dfweml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> |
Hi, Alper, Alper Yegin wrote: >>> We know BGP is not designed for handling many rapid changes (after all >>> non-mobile prefixes are much more stable compared to a moving MN). But >>> of source that does not necessarily mean BGP cannot handle it. I'm not >>> a BGP expert to confirm. It may be worth running this by the routing >>> related WGs and collect some feedback. >> >> There have been studies of the basic propagation time of an UPDATE >> through a BGP router. It can be done in as little as 2.4ms if the >> timers and batching are configured properly. >> > > A reference would be good. See, e.g., "Measuring BGP Pass-Through Times" by Feldman, Kong, Maennel, and Tudor http://www.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de/papers/FKMT-MBPT-04.pdf -Pete