Re: tunnels-vs-host routes and other DMM components

Peter McCann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <5963DDF1F751474D8DEEFDCDBEE43AE7182E25B1@dfweml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Hi, Alper,

Alper Yegin wrote:
>>> We know BGP is not designed for handling many rapid changes (after all
>>> non-mobile prefixes are much more stable compared to a moving MN). But
>>> of source that does not necessarily mean BGP cannot handle it. I'm not
>>> a BGP expert to confirm. It may be worth running this by the routing
>>> related WGs and collect some feedback.
>> 
>> There have been studies of the basic propagation time of an UPDATE
>> through a BGP router.  It can be done in as little as 2.4ms if the
>> timers and batching are configured properly.
>> 
> 
> A reference would be good.

See, e.g., "Measuring BGP Pass-Through Times" by Feldman, Kong, Maennel, and Tudor
http://www.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de/papers/FKMT-MBPT-04.pdf

-Pete
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.