Re: AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dmm-requirements

On 1/24/14 7:38 PM, h chan wrote:
> 4. Section 4: - I am not sure that it benefits the document to label
> PS6 and PS7 as related.  Those issues are problematic on their own.
> If you remove the "(related problem)" label from them, make sure that
> REQ2 is updated to remove mention of "related problem".
> 
> The intention of the name "related problems" was not to suggest they
> are less problematic, but rather to distinguish them from the other
> problems directly on mobility management. Although these problems are
> not directly on mobility management, the DMM solutions can solve
> these additional problems. They are therefore included. So, as long
> as this section is not to be interpreted as limited to problems
> directly on mobility management, we can drop the word "related."
> 

I will leave it to the authors/WG, but I don't see a benefit to the
"related" tag.

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS5l0PAAoJEBOZRqCi7goqx7oIAK2VR4Zp7/o4tta1ZE64ksco
3vxmhL11lNMOW14UZVMB6/pinSkgfWtkX+Ua5O1+f6Hbl9ygT9UXEFq0IKwQXwBd
9f9bn19YYT0m61q7uYHNVmKwz2t9oLK/urxV/PVqNQssnV2qc9nhz0vZ/51TB46i
BxF83IlywMl4sCzW8WapmL/+h6FAFHrpaxklB+S6ZQyhtKWnwGUzO7QkehUsHtpx
5i92g5aGfdQpzU9WcH+xasQafCK7vekDuJP2WxijwjD8nenfOg5PQMYSRGRfLHdK
naNIAXtQY8N7ROPhm0dERC/lpMJ9QbilZ2Etn0o078CxfADqnFgvTqHxEWzTJtE=
=XR45
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----