Re: AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dmm-requirements
Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Anthony, On 1/29/14 1:51 PM, h chan wrote: > Brian, > > The requirement is intended to include a capability of not using > network-layer mobility management, as opposed to using it by default. > > > I think it is sufficient to leave to the explanation (the sentences > after the first sentence) to say that network-layer mobility support > is not always needed in order to justify this capability. > > The alternative then is to say that network-layer mobility is > provided but it is possible to not use such support. > > REQ2: Using and not Using Network-layer mobility support > > DMM solutions MUST enable network-layer mobility but it MUST be > possible to not invoke it. Mobility support is needed, for example, > when an application or a host cannot cope with a change in the IP > address when a node moves. Yet a mobile node can often be > stationary, and mobility support can also be provided at other > layers. It is then not always necessary to maintain a stable IP > address or prefix. > > Of cause "enable" does not mean it must be used. Yet explicitly say > "it is possible to not invoke it" is to draw the contrast to using it > by default. My only concern is that it is unclear *who* invokes the network-layer mobility support. Is it envisioned that the application can signal the need for mobility support? Does the user have to configure which applications get support? Regards, Brian _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 536 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS6ltCAAoJEBOZRqCi7goqnCUH/3P+fEVg/u6LiUGmb0/emQu4 oQoI6+1M08d5dHM5RDpsZ3OuH45mRRC+gqhbgkxPubCxQVuB5ovK/4Ni50i6bVFz Mj+UOYl6JEuTUmPGT592EnTJVX70MkHcWGJ0+XwcU37HdiKCrBtYcMobmpiuF4yT Ak8PMKvVayaCEuZ4kmqgvJYOQC3BOfiRh0qIAkl/xoc8/yqxAgrJbCnV8YjtRWf9 lMuXg+HuRxDExOjFKs+8e5U8E1LAHS300xAG0eROvwPqLbQ1aRJHM1o5UWLACfR6 tMdIOPFaMb06M9AWWEP6js1xd5JbXPdgnlKKKQxe4+4LlQ7mdMSQpN3Mg1yMvEI= =6UlA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----