Re: AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dmm-requirements

Brian Haberman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nemo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Anthony,

On 1/29/14 1:51 PM, h chan wrote:
> Brian,
> 
> The requirement is intended to include a capability of not using
> network-layer mobility management, as opposed to using it by default.
> 
> 
> I think it is sufficient to leave to the explanation (the sentences
> after the first sentence) to say that network-layer mobility support
> is not always needed in order to justify this capability.
> 
> The alternative then is to say that network-layer mobility is
> provided but it is possible to not use such support.
> 
> REQ2:  Using and not Using Network-layer mobility support
> 
> DMM solutions MUST enable network-layer mobility but it MUST be
> possible to not invoke it. Mobility support is needed, for example, 
> when an application or a host cannot cope with a change in the IP
> address when a node moves. Yet a mobile node can often be
> stationary, and mobility support can also be provided at other
> layers. It is then not always necessary to maintain a stable IP
> address or prefix.
> 
> Of cause "enable" does not mean it must be used. Yet explicitly say
> "it is possible to not invoke it" is to draw the contrast to using it
> by default.

My only concern is that it is unclear *who* invokes the network-layer
mobility support.  Is it envisioned that the application can signal the
need for mobility support?  Does the user have to configure which
applications get support?

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 536 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS6ltCAAoJEBOZRqCi7goqnCUH/3P+fEVg/u6LiUGmb0/emQu4
oQoI6+1M08d5dHM5RDpsZ3OuH45mRRC+gqhbgkxPubCxQVuB5ovK/4Ni50i6bVFz
Mj+UOYl6JEuTUmPGT592EnTJVX70MkHcWGJ0+XwcU37HdiKCrBtYcMobmpiuF4yT
Ak8PMKvVayaCEuZ4kmqgvJYOQC3BOfiRh0qIAkl/xoc8/yqxAgrJbCnV8YjtRWf9
lMuXg+HuRxDExOjFKs+8e5U8E1LAHS300xAG0eROvwPqLbQ1aRJHM1o5UWLACfR6
tMdIOPFaMb06M9AWWEP6js1xd5JbXPdgnlKKKQxe4+4LlQ7mdMSQpN3Mg1yMvEI=
=6UlA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.