Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-14.txt
Alexandru Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nemo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
H Anthony, > REQ2: Bypassable network-layer mobility support > > DMM solutions MUST enable network-layer mobility but it MUST > > be possible to not use it. Mobility support is needed, for > > example, when a mobile host moves and an application cannot > > cope with a change in the IP address. Mobility support is > > also needed, for example, when a mobile router moves together > > with a host and an application in the host is interrupted by a > > change of IP address of the mobile router > > and the presence of ingress filtering. Sounds good, technically. Since this is already a long phrase maybe we could detail it further, and then later make it better, or separate. How about this: > Distributed Mobility Management support is also needed, for example, > when a Mobile Router moves together with a Host and an application > running in the Host (LFN) is disturbed by the change of address of > the Mobile Router. Specifically, the incoming packets towards the > Host may be blocked at a Router in the path from the CN, or may be > taking a longer path through the Home Agent (in case Mobile IP is > used); an application sending packets from the Host may be blocked by > the ingress filtering potentially set in the access network, or may > take a longer path through the Home Agent (in case Mobile IP is > used). What do you think? Alex Alex > > However mobility > > support at the network-layer is not always needed; a mobile > > node can often be stationary, and mobility support can also be > > provided at other layers. It is then not always necessary to > > maintain a stable IP address or prefix. Le 14/02/2014 00:35, h chan a écrit : > Alex, > > Thanks for spelling out the conditions more accurately. Just to > confirm whether the addition the text in red as in the following is > needed for accuracy reasons. > > May I ask whether we can alternatively assume that ingress filtering > should always not be prevented. Then when the red text is missing as > in version 14, is that still incorrect or it needs to be corrected? > > REQ2: Bypassable network-layer mobility support > > DMM solutions MUST enable network-layer mobility but it MUST > > be possible to not use it. Mobility support is needed, for > > example, when a mobile host moves and an application cannot > > cope with a change in the IP address. Mobility support is > > also needed, for example, when a mobile router moves together > > with a host and an application in the host is interrupted by a > > change of IP address of the mobile router > > and the presence of ingress filtering. > > However mobility > > support at the network-layer is not always needed; a mobile > > node can often be stationary, and mobility support can also be > > provided at other layers. It is then not always necessary to > > maintain a stable IP address or prefix. > > H Anthony Chan > > -----Original Message----- From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 3:28 > AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DMM] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-14.txt > > Thanks for this new version. > > A comment: > >> Mobility support is also needed, for example, when a mobile router > >> moves together with a host and an application in the host is > >> interrupted by a change of IP address of the mobile router. > > ^and presence of ingress filtering. > > Alex > > Le 03/02/2014 23:36, [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >> directories. This draft is a work item of the Distributed Mobility > >> Management Working Group of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management > >> Authors : H Anthony Chan Dapeng Liu Pierrick Seite >> Hidetoshi > >> Yokota Jouni Korhonen Filename : > >> draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-14.txt Pages : 19 Date > >> : 2014-02-03 > >> > >> Abstract: This document defines the requirements for Distributed > >> Mobility Management (DMM) at the network layer. The hierarchical > >> structure in traditional wireless networks has led primarily to > >> centralized deployment models. As some wireless networks are >> evolving > >> away from the hierarchical structure, a distributed model for >> mobility > >> management can be useful to them. > >> > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-requirements/ > >> > >> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-14 > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-14 > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > >> tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce >> mailing > >> list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft > >> directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > dmm mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >